Name the options and the criteria you care about, such as cost, time, or convenience. Ask AI to show its reasoning and point out missing information. Check changing facts yourself and make the final choice.
Compare approaches to the book swap
Use the same criteria for each option
Suppose the organizer is choosing how people will indicate interest. A consistent comparison keeps one appealing option from getting easier treatment than the others.
Worked comparison: how should people respond?
| Approach | Possible benefit | Possible trade-off | What is still unknown? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration required | May help estimate supplies if responses are accurate. | Could make attending harder for someone who cannot use the chosen response method. | Does the venue require a head count? Can the organizer manage responses? |
| Drop-in | Simple for participants; no reply is needed. | Attendance is harder to estimate. | What is the verified room capacity and expected turnout? |
| Optional RSVP | Offers a way to respond while still allowing drop-ins. | Counts may not predict actual attendance. | Can the plan work safely if more people arrive than replied? |
Confirmed facts: in this fictional example, the event is intended to be free and welcoming. Assumptions: a response will help estimate attendance; people can access the response method. Missing information: room capacity, venue rules, expected attendance, and the organizer’s available time. These must be checked with the venue and organizer; AI cannot supply them as facts.
First identify hard requirements, such as permission and safe capacity. Then rank preferences such as ease or a better estimate. The best choice depends on those priorities and verified details; AI can help compare, but the organizer decides.
Try a consistent comparison:
“Compare registration required, drop-in, and optional RSVP for our book swap. Use the same hard requirements and preferences for each. Separate the details I gave you from assumptions and missing facts. Do not choose a winner for me; show the trade-offs and ask what I value most.”
Check that each option was judged by the same criteria. Then decide which preferences matter most to you and record your choice, reason, and facts to verify.
Make a decision you can explain
Choose between approaches to a routine you know. Record must-haves, preferences, confirmed facts, assumptions, and missing details. Decide which option fits your own priorities and what you will verify before acting.
One routine · four lessons
Decision Record
Compare the same choices against the same criteria. Separate what you know from what you are assuming, and keep missing facts visible until you check them.
Your work saves in this browser and is included in the learning-work export. It does not sync across devices; clearing browser data may remove it. You can use the same headings on paper and carry your notes forward.
Using another AI assistant? Read the beginner’s guide.
Review the work you saved in earlier lessons
Lesson 1 · Workflow Step Plan
- Goal
- Not added yet
- Steps
- Not added yet
- Order And Dependencies
- Not added yet
- Human Review
- Not added yet
Lesson 2 · Reusable Context Card
- Purpose
- Not added yet
- Audience
- Not added yet
- Constraints
- Not added yet
- Desired Format
- Not added yet
- Unknown Details
- Not added yet
Example: registration required, drop-in, or optional RSVP.
Example: free to attend, venue permission confirmed, and a plan that fits the room’s verified capacity.
Example: easy for first-time attendees; low effort for organizers.
Name the source or person and date where useful. Do not label a guess as a fact.
Example: most neighbors will see an online invitation. That needs checking.
Example: room capacity, expected attendance, and whether all attendees can use the RSVP method.
You choose. State what you will verify before acting.
Your notes save as you type and are included in the local learning-work export.
Save your Decision Record and name one fact you will verify. Mark this lesson complete when ready.